April 5, 2011 § Leave a comment
“I […] believe that the technology so commonplace to our homes belongs in our classrooms as well.”¹
“Even at this late stage of their development, classroom computers are still often seen only as boxes to run fixed applications, rather than as vehicles with which we can extend and expand our thinking.”²
“The great majority of today’s educators have little interest in classroom computing. An unfortunate consequence of this disinterest is that these teachers, many of whom are tremendously effective, are assuming that the quality of their instruction can’t benefit from exposure to new technology. We need to examine the role of technology as a tool that can help us teach the whole child.”³
“As I look at the challenges facing education today, it seems to me that we need more hackers – not just computer hackers, of course, but hackers in all areas of knowledge.”4
In going through all the unprocessed materials in the Curriculum Library, I’ve found a few interesting items. One provide the above quotes. Outside of a few dated expressions – “classroom computing” rather than “mobile technologies” or “social networking,” for example – I think it would be easy to find someone writing, blogging or tweeting these exact sentiments today. In fact, someone may have expressed these exact sentiments today on #edchat, where the discussion is on how to incorporate social media into the classrooms, and get more teachers and administrators to buy in to its use.
This is not surprising – until you realize that the book (Education, Technology, and Paradigms of Change for the 21st Century, by David Thornburg) was published in 1989. Over 20 years later, and we are still having the same arguments. The more I read, the more I weed (the collection, that is!), the more I realize that this is true pretty much everywhere:
This reminds me of a question I was asked while participating in a panel about technology in librarianship at the Unpacking the Library conference in Iowa City. The question was whether we were worried about the future – won’t social media, texting, etc. desensitize our children, and make it hard for them to interact face-to-face?
My short answer? No. I am not scared. I am not worried.
Why? Because every generation thinks that some new technology is going to “harm” the children, is going to change the way society functions. Radio? Movies? Television? Video games? Even books? All causes of concern at some point. None (at least so far), has incapacitated an entire generation.
Change is good. Sure, there will be missteps along the way. There may even be instances that one can point to and say “SEE! I told you that thinking has gotten more shallow!” But we are doing ourselves and everyone else that will come after us an unbelievable disservice to ignore change because of such anecdotal evidence. We need to do better by our students. To paraphrase a student post about her knowledge of the internet, we must adapt to change, because it affects us, whether we realize it or not.
And it definitely affects students. As educators (and yes, librarians are educators, too), we must be able to teach and model use, answer questions, and promote reflection about technology and change.
1. Pg. 8
2. Pg. 13
3. Pg. 16-17
4. Pg. 89
March 18, 2011 § 2 Comments
A little while ago I blogged about a great project begun last fall by a group of dedicated and engaged Library and Information Science students. I’ve also written about my efforts to use social media to gain a better understanding of the teaching profession and its goals. For the past nine months, I’ve been participating in a webinar series via edweb.net (Using Emerging Technology to Advance Your School Library Program) put together by Michelle Luhtala, a fantastic teacher librarian from Conneticut.
What do all these things have in common? I think they demonstrate how you can use social media and other free tools to learn, and engage others in your field or area of interest every day.
TEP students, my advice to you is to engage with others in your chosen profession right now. Get started today.
Join conversations on Twitter. Read blogs. Listen to what other teachers across the country and around the world have to say. Engage with them. Share resources. Share concerns. Share ideas. Every day. Every. Day. Get started now. If you do, will not regret that you did.
I know it may seem like something that will be too time consuming, but really, it takes as much time as you want it to. If you have a Twitter account, start following teachers who inspire you. Here’s my list if you need a place to start. If you don’t have a Twitter account, here is a great video by 6th grade teacher Josh Stumpenhorst to get you started.
Don’t forget. Get started now.
January 4, 2011 § 1 Comment
I’ve said it before: I am not a teacher. At least not in the formal sense.* I do not have a teaching degree. However, I consider myself a dilettante (in the most positive sense of the term) as I’ve spent the last two years building a PLN that includes teachers and librarians, and reading about education. I have certainly learned LOADS since coming to my current position.
As you may have already figured out from previous posts, as well as my Twitter profile, I am an enthusiastic user of technology. I often become excited about the vaguely imagined “possibilities” of a technology long before giving its use considerable thought. However, I usually find this useful, since it eventually dawns on me how a particular technology may fit seamlessly into a project, or aid a current effort.
I definitely fall into the camp of “it’s not necessary, but man, is it nice” when discussing technology. I don’t argue that one can’t be a great teacher with only a chalkboard. And I definitely agree that many people can lose sight of a goal when using a particularly glittery technology.
The point I usually argue with the professors I work with is that the use of technology does not necessarily change their teaching in the classroom, it changes the student’s experience inside and outside the classroom. Since I am recently (relatively) out of graduate school, and my graduate experience was vastly different than my undergraduate experience, I often use these as examples, and I will here as well.
Here’s the scenario: a professor is teaching a new concept. The class is partially taken up by student brainstorming about what the concept is and what it means, and partly by the instructor lecturing. The professor makes notes on the board, possibly draws a picture. The student leaves the class feeling like the concept is tentatively understood.
That’s it. Most of my experience as a learner that I can recall goes something like this.**
Now, the above scenario can take place in two different settings. One, with only a chalkboard, notepaper and pencils (my undergraduate life). Two, with PowerPoint (or some variation of presentation software, my favorite being Prezi***), computers, an interactive whiteboard,**** a course software technology like Blackboard or Moodle, cloud computing and social networks (my graduate school life).
In the first setting, the student will have to furiously take notes, hoping to both capture the conversation and lecture, and be able to pay enough attention to understand what is going on and contribute to the discussion. Later, when reviewing the topic, the student will have only his or her notes to refer to. The chalkboard has long been erased, and there is no hope of seeing if the drawing in my notebook is accurate to what the professor drew. Some students are friendly outside of class, and decide to form a study group. They meet and share notes, and take more notes from others’ notes. They ask additional questions in class. Consequently, the professor will probably have to take more class time to review the subject. This is how we never got to the end of a syllabus in any class I took in college.
In the second scenario, students still take notes, but on their laptop. In my experience, I’m a much faster typer than writer, and can get more down in less time.***** But since the teacher is using an IWB, there is no need to copy down what the professor is writing on the board, only particularly helpful points to refer to later. The professor will save the board and post it on the class Blackboard page later so students may refer to it and review. For the lecture portion of the class, the professor has prepared a Prezi. This, too, will be available for students to review. The professor has also created a video she will use in class, using the overhead projection unit, of herself drawing the picture of the concept so the students can watch the drawing being created over and over again if necessary, so no subtlety will be missed. Students are encouraged to use social media to discuss topics introduced in class, and through this they learn that several other people are having trouble comprehending aspects of the new concept, and agree to meet to review and help each other. They create a Google Doc to share their combined understanding, and ask the teacher to participate. The professor has time to correct some misunderstandings before the next class time, and so the class can move forward in their discussions.
OK. I realize that what I just gave you was an idealized version of the classroom (I think in both scenarios). In the second scenario, I’m assuming that the student is engaged enough to be taking notes, rather than cruising Facebook during class, that the teacher will actually post the IWB screenshot and Prezi in a timely fashion, that students will review the posted material and discuss their respective realizations and frustrations, and that they will take the initiative to create a document summarizing their mutual understanding. Not every student will be thus engaged.
However, this is no reason to shy away from technology. Technology doesn’t make a better teacher, and it certainly won’t make a better student. What it will do is give the student opportunities that he or she wouldn’t have otherwise. Ideally, it will free them to think more critically about a subject, since they won’t be struggling to write down everything, and can review at their own pace.
* Full disclosure: I was an education major until the end of my sophomore year in college. I didn’t make it past the psychology prerequisites, and decided to focus on history instead of history education. I blame NCLB (I started college in the fall of 2000), as well as a distaste for being told what I can and can’t do (i.e. textbooks to use, subjects to cover). Originally, I intended to get a PhD in history, but stalled out due to fear of failure and taking the GRE. Librarianship seemed a the perfect answer to my career dilemma.
** If I could remember more of high school, I could confirm it being my experience there as well. As it is, from what I can recall this is accurate.
*** I particularly like Prezi because of the zooming feature. I prefer to think of the space as a content map, so that you can zoom out and the full picture makes sense for the topic, and the viewer can see an overview (quite literally), and zoom in to various places to see detail. I am obviously a visual learner.
**** Again, full disclosure: we didn’t have one of these when I was in graduate school, but I wish we did. I’m including it here for the sake of showing how it could possibly be useful.
***** I’ve been known to actually transcribe an entire class session on a particularly frustrating topic. Seriously. If we had been using an IWB, I may not have needed to, but I probably still would. It is for these instances that I think that digital recorders are useful for some subjects.
November 10, 2010 § Leave a comment
My Diigo group is on a roll today. Here’s another wiki full of explanations, links and ideas.
November 10, 2010 § Leave a comment
This blog list social networking sites for various ages. Also, some funny videos about how lame some tweets/twitter users can be.