October 14, 2010 § Leave a Comment
I love Judy Blume as much as the next person, but are you looking for some new material for your YA readers? Here’s a recent list of fantastic debut novels. Give one a try!
Ban Violent Books from Prison Libraries, Urges Connecticut State Senator | American Libraries Magazine
October 14, 2010 § Leave a Comment
The idea of limiting inmates’ reading material reminds me of the late 19th century notion amongst librarians that individuals could be “improved” through proper reading choices. It seems a little ridiculous to think that because a person reads a novel about a violent crime, he is more likely to commit on in the future. I’d dare say that if that person is likely to commit a violent crime, he’ll do it no matter what he’s read in the last year (or ten).
I wonder if the Berkeley County Detention Center has done any studies to see if their policy has reduced crime committed by recently released inmates. I doubt it.
What do you think about limiting the reading material of inmates?
September 30, 2010 § Leave a Comment
Watch out! These dangerous reading materials are available in our Curriculum Library– for future teachers to read!
Twilight (series), By Stephanie Meyer
Reasons: Sexually Explicit, Religious Viewpoint, Unsuited to Age Group
Banned in Australia (2009) for primary school students because the series is too racy. Librarians have stripped the books from shelves in some junior schools because they believe the content is too sexual and goes against religious beliefs. They even have asked parents not to let kids bring their own copies of Stephenie Meyer’s smash hit novels — which explore the stormy love affair between a teenage girl and a vampire — to school. Source: Nov. 2009, pp. 207–8.
Twisted, by Laurie Halse Anderson
Withdrawn from classroom use and the approved curriculum at the Montgomery County, Ky. High School (2009), but available at the high school library and student book club. Some parents have complained about fi ve novels that contain foul language and cover topics — including sex, child abuse, suicide, and drug abuse — deemed unsuited for discussion in coed high school classes. They also contend that the books don’t provide the intellectual challenge and rigor that students need in college preparatory classes. The titles appeared on suggested book lists compiled by the Young Adult Library Services Association, a division of the American Library Association, for twelve- to eighteen-year-olds who are “reluctant readers.” The superintendent removed the book because it wasn’t on the pre-approved curriculum list and couldn’t be added by teachers in the middle of a school year without permission. Source: Jan. 2010, pp. 16–17; Mar. 2010, p. 56.
The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, by Sherman Alexie
Retained on the summer reading list at Antioch, Ill. High School (2009) despite objections from several parents who found its language vulgar and racist. In response to concerns, however, the district will form a committee each March to review future summer reading assignments. The committee, which will include parents, would decide whether parents should be warned if a book contains possibly objectionable material. Source: Sept. 2009, p. 171.
The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck
Burned by the East St. Louis, IL Public Library (1939) and barred from the Buffalo, NY Public Library (1939) on the grounds that “vulgar words” were used. Banned in Kansas City, MO (1939); Banned in Kern County CA the scene of Steinbeck’s novel, (1939); Banned in Ireland ( 1953); On Feb. 21, 1973, eleven Turkish book publishers went on trial before an Istanbul martial law tribunal on charges of publishing, possessing and selling books in violation of an order of the Istanbul martial law command. They faced possible sentences of between one month’s and six months’ imprisonment “for spreading propaganda unfavorable to the state” and the confiscation of their books. Eight booksellers were also on trial with the publishers on the same charge involving the Grapes of Wrath; Banned in Kanawha, IA High School classes (1980); Challenged in Vernon Verona Sherill, NY School District (1980); Challenged as required reading for Richford, VT (1981) High School English students due to the book’s language and portrayal of a former minister who recounts how he took advantage of a young woman. Banned in Morris, Manitoba, Canada (1982); Removed from two Anniston, Ala. high school libraries (1982), but later reinstated on a restrictive basis. Challenged at the Cummings High School in Burlington, NC (1986) as an optional reading assignment because the “book is full of filth. My son is being raised in a Christian home and this book takes the Lord’s name in vain and has all kinds of profanity in it.” Although the parent spoke to the press, a formal complaint with the school demanding the book’s removal was not filed. Challenged at the Moore County school system in Carthage, NC (1986) because the book contains the phase “God damn:” Challenged in the Greenville, SC schools (1991) because the book uses the name of God and Jesus in a “vain and profane manner along with inappropriate sexual references.” Challenged in the Union City, TN High School classes(1993).
Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck
Banned in Ireland (1953); Syracuse, IN (1974); Oil City, PA (I977); Grand Blanc, MI (1979); Continental, OH (1980) and other communities. Challenged in Greenville, SC (1977) by the Fourth Province of the Knights of the Ku Klux KIan; Vernon Verona Sherill, NY School District (1980); St. David, AZ (1981) and Tell City, IN (1982) due to “profanity and using God’s name in vain.” Banned from classroom use at the Scottsboro, AL Skyline High School (1983) due to “profanity.” The Knoxville, TN School Board chairman vowed to have “filthy books” removed from Knoxville’s public schools (1984) and picked Steinbeck’s novel as the first target due to “its vulgar language.” Reinstated at the Christian County, KY school libraries and English classes (1987) after being challenged as vulgar and offensive. Challenged in the Marion County, WV schools (1988), at the Wheaton Warrenville, IL Middle School (1988), and at the Berrien Springs, MI High School (1988) because the book contains profanity. Removed from the Northside High School in Tuscaloosa, AL (1989) because the book “has profane use of God’s name.” Challenged as a summer youth program reading assignment in Chattanooga, TN (1989) because “Steinbeck is known to have had an anti business attitude:” In addition, “he was very questionable as to his patriotism:’ Removed from all reading lists and collected at the White Chapel High School in Pine Bluff, AR (1989) because of objections to language. Challenged as appropriate for high school reading lists in the Shelby County, TN school system (1989) because the novel contained “offensive language.” Challenged, but retained in a Salina, KS (1990) tenth grade English class despite concerns that it contained “profanity” and “takes the Lord’s name in vain.” Challenged by a Fresno, CA (1991) parent as a tenth grade English college preparatory curriculum assignment, citing “profanity” and “racial slurs.” The book was retained, and the child of the objecting parent was provided with an alternative reading assignment. Challenged in the Riveria, TX schools (1990) because it contains profanity. Challenged as curriculum material at the Ringgold High School in Carroll Township, PA (1991) because the novel contains terminology offensive to blacks. Removed and later returned to the Suwannee, FL High School library (1991) because the book is “indecent” Challenged at the Jacksboro, TN High School (1991) because the novel contains “blasphemous” language, excessive cursing, and sexual overtones. Challenged as required reading in the Buckingham County, VA schools (1991) because of profanity. In 1992 a coalition of community members and clergy in Mobile, AL requested that local school officials form a special textbook screening committee to “weed out objectionable things:” Steinbeck’s novel was the first target because it contained “profanity” and “morbid and depressing themes.’ Temporarily removed from the Hamilton, OH High School reading list (1992) after a parent complained about its vulgarity and racial slurs. Challenged in the Waterloo, IA schools (1992) and the Duval County, FL public school libraries (1992) because of profanity, lurid passages about sex, and statements defamatory to minorities, God, women, and the disabled. Challenged at the Modesto, CA High School as recommended reading (1992) because of “offensive and racist language.” The word “nigger” appears in the book. Challenged at the Oak Hill High School in Alexandria, LA (1992) because of profanity. Challenged as an appropriate English curriculum assignment at the Mingus, AZ Union High School (1993) because of “profane language, moral statement, treatment of the retarded, and the violent ending.” Pulled from a classroom by Putnam County, TN school superintendent (1994) “due to the language.’ Later, after discussions with the school district counsel, it was reinstated. The book was challenged in the Loganville, GA High School (1994) because of its “vulgar language throughout.” Challenged in the Galena, KS school library (1995) because of the book’s language and social implications. Retained in the Bemidji, MN schools (1995) after challenges to the book’s “objectionable” language. Challenged at the Stephens County High School library in Toccoa, Ga (I995) because of “curse words.’’ The book was retained. Challenged, but retained in a Warm Springs, VA High School (1995) English class. Banned from the Washington Junior High School curriculum in Peru, IL (1997) because it was deemed “age inappropriate:” Challenged, but retained, in the Louisville, OH high school English classes (1997) because of profanity. Removed, restored, restricted, and eventually retained at the Bay County schools in Panama City, FL (1997). A citizen group, the 100 Black United, Inc., requested the novel’s removal and “any other inadmissible literary books that have racial slurs in them, such as the using of the word ‘Nigger.” Challenged as a reading list assignment for a ninth grade literature class, but retained at the Sauk Rapids Rice High School in St. Cloud, MN (1997). A parent complained that the book’s use of racist language led to racist behavior and racial harassment. Challenged in O’Hara Park Middle School classrooms in Oakley, CA (1998) because it contains racial epithets. Challenged, but retained, in the Bryant, AR school library (1998) because of a parent’s complaint that the book “takes God’s name in vain 15 times and uses Jesus’s name lightly.” Challenged at the Barron, WI School District (1998). Challenged, but retained in the sophomore curriculum at West Middlesex, PA High School (1999) despite objections to the novel’s profanity. Challenged in the Tomah, WI School District (1999) because the novel is violent and contains obscenities. Challenged as required reading at the high school in Grandville, MI (2002) because the book “is full of racism, profanity, and foul language.” Banned from the George County, MS schools (2002) because of profanity. Challenged in the Normal, IL Community High Schools (2003) because the books contains “racial slurs, profanity, violence, and does not represent traditional values.” An alternative book, Steinbeck’s The Pearl, was offered but rejected by the family challenging the novel. The committee then recommended The House on Mango Street and The Way to Rainy Mountain as alternatives. Retained in the Greencastle-Antrim, PA (2006) tenth-grade English classes. A complaint was filed because of “racial slurs” and profanity used throughout the novel. The book has been used in the high school for more than thirty years, and those who object to its content have the option of reading an alternative reading. Cahllenged at the Newton, IA High School (2007) because of concerns about profanity and the portrayal of Jesus Christ. Newton High School has required students to read the book since at least the early 1980s. In neighboring Des Moines, it is on the recommended reading list for ninth-grade English, and it is used for some special education students in the eleventh and twelfth grades. Retained in the Olathe, KS Ninth grade curriculum (2007) despite a parent calling the novel a “worthless, profanity-riddled book” which is “derogatory towards African Americans, women, and the developmentally disabled.”
Deadline, by Chris Crutcher
Withdrawn from classroom use and the approved curriculum at the Montgomery County, Ky. High School (2009), but available at the high school library and student book club. Some parents have complained about fi ve novels containing foul language and covering topics — including sex, child abuse, suicide, and drug abuse — unsuited for discussion in coed high school classes. They also contend that the books don’t provide the intellectual challenge and rigor that students need in college preparatory classes. The titles appeared on suggested book lists compiled by the Young Adult Library Services Association, a division of the American Library Association, for twelve- to eighteen-year-olds who are “reluctant readers.” The superintenden removed the book because it wasn’t on the pre-approved curriculum list and couldn’t be added by teachers in the middle of a school year without permission. Source: Jan. 2010, pp. 16–17; Mar. 2010, p. 56.
Lord of the Rings, by J.R.R. Tolkien
Burned in Alamagordo, NM (2001) outside Christ Community Church along with other Tolkien novels as satanic.
The Amber Spyglass (His Dark Materials series), by Phillip Pullman
Reasons: political viewpoint, religious viewpoint, and violence
Olive’s Ocean, by Kevin Henkes
Reasons: offensive language, sexually explicit
The Adventures of Huckleberry Fin, by Mark Twain
My Brother Sam is Dead, by James Lincoln Collier
Retained in all Muscogee County, Ga. elementary school libraries (2009), despite a parent’s concerns about profanity in the book. Source: May 2009.
The Giver, by Lois Lowry
Appalled by descriptions of adolescent pill-popping, suicide, and lethal injections given to babies and the elderly, two parents demanded that the Mt. Diablo School District, headquartered in Concord, Calif. (2007), eliminate the controversial but award-winning book from the school reading lists and libraries. Source: Jan. 2008, p. 8.
Anastasia Krupnik, by Lois Lowry
Profanity or Inappropriate Language
The Stupids (series), by Harry G. Allard
The first book in the series The Stupids Have a Ball, gets banned because the Stupids throw a costume party to celebrate their children failing every subject in school (including recess). Its critics say this promotes negative behavior and reinforces low self esteem. Another book in the series The Stupids Die gets banned due to objections about the word “die” in its title.
A Wrinkle in Time, by Madeleine L’Engle
Reasons given include the book’s references to witches and crystal balls (although the characters are not in fact witches, and the crystal ball is a science-fictional one), the claim that it “challenges religious beliefs”, and the listing of Jesus “with the names of great artists, philosophers, scientists, and religious leaders”.
Blubber, by Judy Blume
Reason: Language and bullying behavior (www2.lib.virginia.edu/exhibits/censored/child.html)
Harry Potter (series), by J.K. Rowling
The Gwinnett County, Ga. school board (2006) rejected a parent’s pleas to take Harry Potter books out of school libraries, based on the claim they promote witchcraft. The Georgia Board of Education ruled December 14 that the parent had failed to prove her contention that the series “promote[s] the Wicca religion,” and therefore that the book’s availability in public schools does not constitute advocacy of a religion. On May 29, 2007, Superior Court judge Ronnie Batchelor upheld the Georgia Board of Education’s decision to support local school officials. County school board members have said the books are good tools to encourage children to read and t spark creativity and imagination. Removed from the St. Joseph School in Wakefield, Mass. (2007) because the themes of witchcraft and sorcery were inappropriate for a Catholic school. Source: July 2006, pp. 207-8; Nov. 2006, p. 289; Mar. 2007, pp. 72-73; July 2007, p. 151; Sept. 2007, pp. 205-6; Jan. 2008, pp. 36-37.
A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein
Reasons: subject matters about disobeying parents, dying children and the presence of supernatural forces in the poetry. (http://mrstreme.livejournal.com/61998.html)
Are You there God? It’s Me, Margaret, by Judy Blume
Reason: Discussion of menstruation and religion.
The Face on the Milk Carton, by Caroline B. Cooney
Reason: Sexual content; challenge to authority
Captain Underpants (series), by Dav Pilkey
Reason: insensitivity and being unsuited to age group, as well as encouraging children to disobey authority. Captain Underpants costumes have also been banned from schools.
Bridge to Terabithia, by Katherine Patterson
Reason: Language and religious concerns.
Whale Talk, by Chris Crutcher
Challenged at the Missouri Valley, Iowa High School (2007) because the book uses racial slurs and profanity. Challenged as an optional reading in a bullying unit at the Lake Oswego, Oreg. Junior High School (2007) because the novel is “peppered with profanities, ranging from derogatory slang terms to sexual encounters and violence.” Students are given a list of book summaries and a letter to take to their parents. Four of the eight optional books offered are labeled as having “mature content/language.” Source: May 2007, p. 98; July 2007, p. 149.
Speak, by Laurie Halse Anderson
Reason: Controversial subject matter; sexual content
Junie B. Jones (series), by Barbara Park
Reason: name calling and bad grammar
Staying Fat for Sarah Byrnes, by Chris Crutcher
Goosebumps (series), by R.L. Stine
Diary of Anne Frank
Challenged at the Culpeper County, Va. Public school (2010) by a parent requesting that her daughter not be required to read the book aloud. Initially, it was reported that offi cials have decided to stop assigning a version of Anne Frank’s diary, one of the most enduring symbols of the atrocities of the Nazi regime, due to the complaint that the book includes sexual material and homosexual themes. The director of instruction announced the edition, published on the fiftieth anniversary of Frank’s death in a concentration camp, will not be used in the future despite the fact the school system did not follow its own policy for handling complaints. The remarks set off a hailstorm of criticism online and brought international attention to the 7,600-student school system in rural Virginia. The superintendent said, however, that the book will remain a part of the English classes, although it may be taught at a different grade level. Source: Mar. 2010, pp. 57–58; May 2010, p. 107.
The Egypt Game, by Zilpha Keatley Snyder
Challenged as part of a reading list in a fourth-grade class at Southern Hills Elementary School in Wichita Falls, Tex. (2009) because the book includes scenes depicting Egyptian worship rituals. The Newbery Award-winning book has been an optional part of the school district’s curriculum for years. “I’m not going to stop until it’s banned from the school district. I will not quiet down. I will not back down. I don’t believe any student should be subjected to anything that has to do with evil gods or black magic,” said the student’s father. Source: Jan. 2010, p. 17.
“Communicate[s] complex social ideas and agendas to children who are too young to critically examine them.” Pleasant Valley, Iowa, 2004
The Bad Beginning
Reason: Discusses child abuse and negative thoughts
The Cay, by Theodore Taylor
Reason: Racial remarks, prejudice
Smack, by Melvin Burgess
Reason: Sexual content
Sylvester and the Magic Pebble, by William Steig
The book raised controversy among several school districts and organizations for its satirical portrayal of the police as pigs, and as a result was banned in parts of the United States.
Nappy Hair, by Carolivia Herron
The book celebrates the differences and unique attributes of black people. Yet, when white teacher Ruth Sherman read this book to her third-graders she was pilloried by black and Hispanic community members who had not read the book.
Where the Wild Things Are, by Maurice Sendak
Witchcraft and supernatural elements as well as a spirited child.
The Hatchet, by Gary Paulsen
Reasons for banning it have been descriptions of injuries and trauma that were apparently too well written.
The Lorax, by Dr. Seuss
Banned in some U.S. areas for “being an allegorical political commentary”.
Harriet the Spy, by Louise Fitzhugh
Banned for the apparent poor influence it will have on children which is anti-authoritative.
The American Heritage Dictionary, Fourth Edition (really…)
“This is one of my favorite cases, although not exactly a kids book; it was banned in some libraries for containing “39 objectionable words” such as slang terms “bed” “knocker” and “balls”. I wonder what Orwell would think of banning the Dictionary, but he’s banned, too, so no one will wonder.”
The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe, by C.S. Lewis
It has been banned in numerous public lower schools, faced criticism from various religious communities, and even faced removal from public libraries.
Sounder, by William H. Armstrong
Has been challenged for use of a racial slur.
Little House on the Prairie (series), by Laura Ingalls Wilder
Has been challenged for its negative treatment of Native Americans.
Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What do you See?, by Bill Martin and Eric Carle
Banned in January 2010 by the Texas Board of Education because the author shares a name with a Marxist theorist. Apparently, no one bothered to check if they were the same person.
The Witches, by Roald Dahl
Concerns over misogyny, violence and devaluing the life of a child.
Information about challenges found on ALA website, bannedbooks.info, thedailybanning.blogspot.com, blisstree.com, dangerousbooks.com, Amazon, the Huffington Post and Wikipedia
April 15, 2010 § Leave a Comment
The ALA has published their list of the most challenged books in 2009. I am sad to say I have only read three of them.** Of course, the others (minus Twilight– sorry!) are immediately going on my “to-read” list.
In case you are feeling really subversive, check out the list of the 100 most challenged books of the last decade. Twelve (possibly thirteen) of these have at one time or another graced my nightstand. I have read other books by a few of the challenged authors as well. (Go me!)
Every time I read a list of banned or challenged books, I think to myself, “Self, how boring do you think reading would be if none of these books were available to you?” And then I answer “Well, Self, pretty boring… I don’t know if I would bother to read if these fantastic books weren’t there to tempt me into their pages.” Then I agree with myself that these books are challenged because they challenge the reader to think. And apparently, that’s not a good thing to all people. After that, I go out and get a few more challenged books to grace my nightstand.
*Once again, a shout out to 100 Scope Notes, for bringing the publication of these lists to my attention. If only I could be as on top of things as 100 Scope Notes!!
**But I have seen the movie for three more! That counts for half-credit, right?